On Dec. 27, 2008, Israel launched a military offensive (Operation Cast Lead) in self defense against a sworn enemy, the Hamas terrorist organization, in the Gaza Strip. Hamas is recognized the world over as a terrorist organization and its government in the Gaza Strip is not recognized by the U.S., the EU, or the U.N. Israel’s belated response to years of Hamas’ murderous rockets was a military operation. True to form, the liberal elements of the media and European governments immediately labeled Israel’s actions as “disproportionate.” This assessment is completely unfair.
It is important to view this latest Middle East conflict within the contextual framework of geography and history. Israel is the only Jewish nation in the entire world. According to the CIA World Factbook, Israel’s total land mass is only 20,330 square kilometers. Israel is surrounded by Arab countries. The total land mass of the surrounding Arab nations, is 9,459,780 square kilometers (note: this figure does not include non-Arab nations that are not friendly to Israel, like Iran). To put this into perspective, Israel is about the size of New Jersey, while the Arab world around it is larger than the entire United States.
Israel has fought three major wars with these Arab countries who sought to deny Israel the right to even exist. Emerging soundly defeated in all of the conflicts, the Arab countries have (for the time being anyway,) abandoned direct assaults on Israel and some (notably Egypt) have made peace accords with Israel. What has replaced these direct military assaults is terrorist activity by organizations like Hezbollah, Hamas, and others through the form of suicide bombings, launching rockets into border towns, etc.
This is the context for this latest conflict. The basic facts of Operation Cast Lead, are these: after Israel withdrew from the Gaza Strip in 2005, the Palestinians elected the terrorist organization Hamas into power (in 2006). Over the next three years, Hamas launched almost 7,000 rockets into Israel. These were unprovoked missile attacks and they targeted innocent Israeli civilians. The rockets Hamas possessed had an operative range of 40km., which effectively put 20 percent of Israel’s population at risk (as reported in US News & World Report on Jan. 15). Finally, after blatant and repeated violations by Hamas of a six month cease-fire, Israel initiated a military offensive on Dec. 27, 2008 against Hamas to stop the rockets. The offensive lasted 22 days and Israel fully withdrew all of its soldiers from the Gaza Strip by Jan. 21.
From a surface look, it is easy to see why the media dubbed Israel’s actions as “disproportionate.” After all, as CNN reported, about 1,300 Palestinians were killed during the war and only 13 Israelis were killed. However, the number of Palestinian casualties may be highly inflated by Hamas. Reporter Lorenzo Cremonesi wrote in the Italian newspaper Corriere della Sera that only 500-600 people were killed, and that most of these were in fact Hamas members. Whether CNN is correct or not, it is important to note that these statistics do not include the many innocent Israelis who were killed from the unprovoked rocket attacks over the previous three years. Neither does CNN distinguish between innocent Palestinian civilians and Hamas personnel.
Indeed distinguishing between Hamas and the innocent bystanders was not always easy. The Spokesperson’s Unit of the Israeli Defense Forces (IDF) documented how Hamas hid weapons in schools and mosques. Hamas operatives shot off rockets and mortars from next to schools, mosques, and residences. Hamas built training camps and arsenals in heavily populated areas. Footage and photos documenting these despicable practices are freely available on the Spokesperson’s Unit’s Web site (http://idfspokesperson.com) and on their YouTube channel (idfnadesk).
One of the sad facts of war is that civilians get killed. But even more civilians get killed when they are used as human shields as they were for Hamas. The IDF went far out of their way to try and minimize civilian casualties. The head of the Sierra Leone Israel Friendship Society, Serajin Rollings-Kamara told the press in Freetown, Sierra Leone, that “Israel was not at war with Palestine, but Hamas.”
Israel was not at war with the Palestinian civilians. All during the hostilities, Israel continued to deliver truck loads of food and aid supplies to the beleaguered Palestinians. The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) Web site lists that (as of Jan. 25), 59,280 tons of humanitarian supplies, along with 3,604,250 liters of fuel have been transported into Gaza using 2,281 trucks.
In its quest to not target Palestinian civilians, Israel even went so far as to send text messages and automated phone calls to Palestinians in target areas prior to air strikes. This warned the innocent bystanders, giving them a chance to flee the area. These warnings also alerted the Hamas personnel who so bravely hid among civilians.
A particularly heinous example of this was reported by Jason Koutsoukis of the Sydney Morning Herald (Australia) on Jan. 26. This article detailed the experiences of Mohammed Shriteh, who works as a Palestinian Red Crescent Society ambulance driver. He said in the article “‘we would co-ordinate with the Israelis before we pick up patients, because they have all our names, and our IDs, so they would not shoot at us.” Indeed as Koutsoukis wrote, the real danger for Shriteh and others like him, was from “Hamas, who would lure ambulances into the heart of battle to transport fighters to safety.”
Ralph Peters, a columnist for the New York Post, wrote on Dec. 29 that Israel “may have executed the most accurate wave of airstrikes in history, with a 15-to-1 terrorist-to-civilian kill ratio.” Instead of congratulating Israel on its commitment to minimize collateral damage and the stellar intelligence that allowed Israel to strike at Hamas with pinpoint accuracy, the world has condemned Israel for a “disproportionate” response to Hamas’ terror tactics.
In a very perverse way, the world is right, because Israel responded in a very disproportionate way: it specifically targeted Hamas and tried to avoid hitting civilian populations, as opposed to Hamas, which directly targeted civilian centers in Israel, like Sderot, Ashkelon, and Beersheba. Israel deliberately aimed for military targets. Hamas however, deliberately placed many of these targets inside civilian centers, (like the weapons caches in mosques and the rocket launching sites in school yards).
A proportionate response would have Palestinian parents fearful every day and night for their children’s lives just as the parents of captured IDF soldier Gilad Shalit have been for the past two years as Hamas holds Shalit captive. A proportionate response would also involve daily airstrikes on the civilians in Gaza for the next two years, just as Hamas has done to Israel with its rockets since it came to power in 2006. We can all be thankful that Israel did not lower itself to the barbaric level of the Hamas and deliver a “proportionate” response.
To get the Israeli perspective on this issue, I spoke with some acquaintances I know in Israel for their opinions. I interviewed Steve—who for security considerations asked only to identified by his first name—who is a immigrant to Israel and an Israeli citizen. I asked him about whether he felt that Israel was right to do what it did in Operation Cast Lead and he said as a Christian, he was against the violence and war, but “in reality,” this was something that probably should have been done a long time ago. When asked about the media’s claims of disproportional action, Steve pointed out that whether or not Israel was right or wrong in this case, “the world does not go on demonstrations about the far bloodier actions in the world. This does not diminish Israel’s responsibility for its actions, but it is curious why Israel is singled out.”
Another Israeli, Shuri Tsukerman, 22, said that “someone who didn’t live in the shadow of missiles for eight years would never understand” the “ridiculous state of existence” forced on southern Israel by Hamas’ rockets. Tsukerman continued, saying that “there is now a new generation of kids who are growing up in the shadow of missiles… thousands of kids can’t sleep at night without waking up from missile alarms… and who can’t focus in class because of fear.”
The Israeli Ministry of Foreign Affairs posted similar facts on its Web site, where it said that the Hamas’ rockets have had a “devastating effect on the daily life and sense of security of the 200,000 residents of the western Negev.” The MFA also cited studies that have found that the rocket attacks have taken a severe mental toll on Israelis; the levels of post-traumatic stress disorder in Sderot alone are close to 30 percent.
Hamas is the enemy of Israel; no questions about it. Written right into its charter (Article 7) is its mission to destroy Israel. The BBC reported on Jan. 2 Fathi Hammad, a senior Hamas leader, as saying “we will not rest until we destroy the Zionist entity.” Given Hamas’ aims, a truly “proportionate” response from Israel would be to completely destroy Hamas.
BY DAN LANDAU
PHOTO EDITOR